Thanks to Daniel I wandered over to the DNC blog, and this is some of what I read in the comments there (bold emphasis mine):
Wolfowitz also said, in a Q&A after a speech at Georgetown Univ. this week, in response to an earnest and critical comment by a female student, "Oh, I see, and I guess then you are one of those people who would be happy to have Hussein remain in power".(to paraphrase). This mantra/tag/talking point is happening all to often. We must train ourselves to respond with something like: That is an utterly moronic, deceptive mistatement of anything that I have said. But of course, whoever the moderator is when someone from the GOP talking troops says such a moronic things, the questioner is cut off from any further comment or rebuttal. Time to start howling, folks. atlantic marg :: Oct 31, 2003 22:28 :: Link
Lance: I am with you - Having Saddam back, and continuing with Inspections still going on, and the UN in charge - would not be a bad thing at all. It is up to the World Courts (UN) to decide what should be done about a despot, not GWB. If you want to read a good article along this line - to to today's copy of Information Clearing House. (www.Informationclearinghouse.info/article 2319.htm) called "The President's Real Goal in Iraq." It had nothing to do with Saddam, nor freeing the Iraqi people.Paul Wolfowitz neglects to say "WHICH" Iraqi would be scared if GWB were gone. Could it be the ones who have benefited from this occupation, either financially or power-wise?
Pam Bergren :: Nov 1, 2003 09:05 :: Link
What's scary is, these folks think they are agreeing with each other!!!
Those comments can be pretty scary. It takes a brave person to venture into them
Posted by: Daniel at November 1, 2003 08:33 PMthat thump you heard was my jaw hitting the floor
Posted by: Ted at November 2, 2003 01:48 AMYeah, I've decided that the DNC blog is going to be a fun place. Lots to see, lots to fisk.